Nthesis is initiated from the L1(Ta). The result is an amplification of unique genomic DNA adjacent to the mobile element. Individual insertion sites can be recognized in this complex mixture of amplicons by labelling and hybridizing to genomic tiling microarrays or by deep sequencing. These data suggest that the rate of new L1 insertions in humans is nearly double previous estimates,O’Donnell and Burns Mobile DNA 2010, 1:21 http://www.mobilednajournal.com/content/1/1/Page 6 ofFigure 1 Techniques for identifying transposon insertions. (A) Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays detect transposable element (TE) insertions. L1 display utilizes primers specific to particular subfamilies of LINE-1 elements. Using this method, candidate dimorphic L1 insertions have been identified. The ATLAS technique employs the principles of L1 display and suppression PCR. Genomic DNA is LY2510924MedChemExpress LY2510924 digested and ligated to oligonucleotide primers, and used as a template in a PCR reaction containing L1 and linker-specific primers. Primary PCR products are then used as templates in a linear PCR reaction containing a radiolabelled subfamily-specific L1 primer. Radiolabelled products are detected by electrophoresis and autoradiography. (B) A comparative genomics approach to identify TE insertions and deletions is depicted. For example, the completion of the draft chimpanzee genome sequence provided an opportunity to identify recently mobilized transposons in humans and chimpanzees. If a transposon insertion is present in only one of the two genomes, it is inferred that the insertion occurred since the existence of their most common recent ancestor ( 6 million years ago). (C) A paired-end mapping approach is shown. This method entails generating paired-ends of several kilobase fragments, which are sequenced using next generation sequencing methodologies. Differences between PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28993237 the paired-end reads and a reference genomic region reveal the presence of structural variation. Simple insertions and deletions can be detected using this method. (D) A next generation sequencing method is shown. Selective amplification of the 3′ end of a transposon is performed followed by deep sequencing. This short-read sequencing approach is able to detect precise insertion positions. (E) Microrray-based methods involve the hybridization of ligation-mediated PCR products to genomic tiling arrays. Specifically, vectorettes are ligated to restriction enzymedigested genomic DNA. The amplified fragments include the 3′ end of a transposon sequence and unique flanking genomic DNA. These amplicons are hybridized to genomic tiling microarrays.with non-parental integrations occurring in nearly 1/100 births, a finding that agrees well with data recently described by Kazazian and colleagues [87]. These types of approaches will undoubtedly be useful in detecting novel TE insertions in both normal individuals and in patients affected with genetic diseases in the future.TEs and human genetic variation To what extent do mobile elements contribute to human genetic diversity? This is a complex question, which is just beginning to be explored in greater depth. Sequencing of the human genome revealed that individual genomes typically exhibit 0.1 variation [2]. Most of the individual genome variation can be attributed to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), chromosome rearrangements, copy number variants and repetitive elements. The Human Genome Project revealed thatthere are 2000 polymorphic L1 elements and.