Es and account for non-specific binding. A representative saturation binding curve and Scatchard transformation of 64Cu-CB-TE1A1P-LLP2A to 5TGM1 cells is shown in Figure 2C. The data show that in the concentration range of 0.5?5.5 nM, 64Cu-CB-TE1A1P-LLP2A is bound to a single class of binding sites with a Kd of 2.2 nM (60.9) and Bmax of 136 pmol/mg (619).Biodistribution of 64Cu-CB-TE1A1P-LLP2A in 5TGM1 Tumor Bearing Immunocompetent/KaLwRij MiceIn vivo biodistribution of 64Cu-CB-TE1A1P-LLP2A was evaluated in KaLwRij mice bearing subcutaneous 5TGM1 tumors (Figure 3). Uptake of the radiotracer was high in the 5TGM1 tumors (12.0464.50 ID/gram). As expected, tracer uptake was highest in the VLA-4 rich hematopoietic organs, spleen (8.861.0 ID/gram) and marrow (11.662.1 ID/g). In a separate cohort of tumor-bearing mice, excess of cold LLP2A ligand was co-administered with 64Cu-CB-TE1A1P-LLP2A. In the presence of the blocking agent, the radiotracer uptake was significantly reduced in the tumor, spleen and bone (p,0.05), demonstrating the in vivo binding specificity of 64Cu-CB-TE1A1PLLP2A (Figure 3, open bars). Biodistribution of 64Cu-CBTE1A1P-LLP2A in BMS5 non-tumor bearing KaLwRij mice was similar to tumor-bearing mice, with spleen and BM being the key uptake organs (data not shown).Small Animal Oltipraz Imaging ExperimentsPrior to small animal PET/CT imaging, mice were injected intravenously (tail vein) with 64Cu-CB-TE1A1P-LLP2A (0.9 MBq (SA: 37 MBq/mg)). At 2 h post injection, mice were anaesthetized with 1? isoflurane and imaged with small animal PET (Focus 220 or Inveon (Siemens Medical Solutions, Knoxville,TN)), while the CT images were acquired with the Inveon. Static images were collected for 30 min and co-registered using the Inveon Research Workstation (IRW) software (Siemens Medical Solutions, Knoxville,TN). PET images were re-constructed with the maximum a posteriori (MAP) algorithm [29]. The analysis of the small animal PET images was done using the IRW software. Regions of interest (ROI) were selected from PET images using CT anatomical guidelines and the activity associated with them was measured with IRW software. Maximum standard uptake values (SUVs) for both experiments were calculated using SUV = ([nCi/mL]x[animal weight (g)]/[injected dose (nCi)]). A set of mice was also imaged at 24 h post injection.Small Animal Imaging ExperimentsTo test the ability of 64Cu-CB-TE1A1P-LLP2A to image MM, small animal PET/CT imaging was conducted in KaLwRij mice bearing 5TGM1 murine myeloma tumors. The following i.p. and s.c. 5TGM1 models were used for the proof-of-principle imaging studies: 1) a non-matrigel assisted s.c. (plasmacytoma) tumor in the flank of the mouse (Figure 4B); 2) a matrigel assisted s.c. tumor in the flank of the mouse (Figure 4C); and 3) tumor cells injected in the peritoneal (i.p.) cavity (Figure 4D). Figure 4 contains four (B-D) representative maximum intensity projection (MIP) small animal PET images using 64Cu-CB-TE1A1P-LLP2A (0.9 MBq, 0.05 mg, 27 pmol, SA: 37 MBq/mg) at 2 h post injection in the variousData Analysis and StatisticsAll data are presented as mean6SD. For statistical classification, a Student’s t test (two-tailed, unpaired) was used to compare individual datasets. All statistical analyses werePET iImaging of Multiple MyelomaFigure 2. Flow cytometry, cell uptake and saturation binding data. A. Greater than 85 of a4 (VLA-4)-positive cells in total 5TGM1 tumor cell population as determined by flow cytometry (Anti-Mo.Es and account for non-specific binding. A representative saturation binding curve and Scatchard transformation of 64Cu-CB-TE1A1P-LLP2A to 5TGM1 cells is shown in Figure 2C. The data show that in the concentration range of 0.5?5.5 nM, 64Cu-CB-TE1A1P-LLP2A is bound to a single class of binding sites with a Kd of 2.2 nM (60.9) and Bmax of 136 pmol/mg (619).Biodistribution of 64Cu-CB-TE1A1P-LLP2A in 5TGM1 Tumor Bearing Immunocompetent/KaLwRij MiceIn vivo biodistribution of 64Cu-CB-TE1A1P-LLP2A was evaluated in KaLwRij mice bearing subcutaneous 5TGM1 tumors (Figure 3). Uptake of the radiotracer was high in the 5TGM1 tumors (12.0464.50 ID/gram). As expected, tracer uptake was highest in the VLA-4 rich hematopoietic organs, spleen (8.861.0 ID/gram) and marrow (11.662.1 ID/g). In a separate cohort of tumor-bearing mice, excess of cold LLP2A ligand was co-administered with 64Cu-CB-TE1A1P-LLP2A. In the presence of the blocking agent, the radiotracer uptake was significantly reduced in the tumor, spleen and bone (p,0.05), demonstrating the in vivo binding specificity of 64Cu-CB-TE1A1PLLP2A (Figure 3, open bars). Biodistribution of 64Cu-CBTE1A1P-LLP2A in non-tumor bearing KaLwRij mice was similar to tumor-bearing mice, with spleen and BM being the key uptake organs (data not shown).Small Animal Imaging ExperimentsPrior to small animal PET/CT imaging, mice were injected intravenously (tail vein) with 64Cu-CB-TE1A1P-LLP2A (0.9 MBq (SA: 37 MBq/mg)). At 2 h post injection, mice were anaesthetized with 1? isoflurane and imaged with small animal PET (Focus 220 or Inveon (Siemens Medical Solutions, Knoxville,TN)), while the CT images were acquired with the Inveon. Static images were collected for 30 min and co-registered using the Inveon Research Workstation (IRW) software (Siemens Medical Solutions, Knoxville,TN). PET images were re-constructed with the maximum a posteriori (MAP) algorithm [29]. The analysis of the small animal PET images was done using the IRW software. Regions of interest (ROI) were selected from PET images using CT anatomical guidelines and the activity associated with them was measured with IRW software. Maximum standard uptake values (SUVs) for both experiments were calculated using SUV = ([nCi/mL]x[animal weight (g)]/[injected dose (nCi)]). A set of mice was also imaged at 24 h post injection.Small Animal Imaging ExperimentsTo test the ability of 64Cu-CB-TE1A1P-LLP2A to image MM, small animal PET/CT imaging was conducted in KaLwRij mice bearing 5TGM1 murine myeloma tumors. The following i.p. and s.c. 5TGM1 models were used for the proof-of-principle imaging studies: 1) a non-matrigel assisted s.c. (plasmacytoma) tumor in the flank of the mouse (Figure 4B); 2) a matrigel assisted s.c. tumor in the flank of the mouse (Figure 4C); and 3) tumor cells injected in the peritoneal (i.p.) cavity (Figure 4D). Figure 4 contains four (B-D) representative maximum intensity projection (MIP) small animal PET images using 64Cu-CB-TE1A1P-LLP2A (0.9 MBq, 0.05 mg, 27 pmol, SA: 37 MBq/mg) at 2 h post injection in the variousData Analysis and StatisticsAll data are presented as mean6SD. For statistical classification, a Student’s t test (two-tailed, unpaired) was used to compare individual datasets. All statistical analyses werePET iImaging of Multiple MyelomaFigure 2. Flow cytometry, cell uptake and saturation binding data. A. Greater than 85 of a4 (VLA-4)-positive cells in total 5TGM1 tumor cell population as determined by flow cytometry (Anti-Mo.